Mahatma Gandhi, the “Father of the Nation”, is a much revered and respected person worldwide. However, many in India (I’m not one among the many) remember him as a person who wronged many of the things he did right by one big mistake – that of allowing Muslims to stay back in India. They believe that just that single decision of his has cost our nation many years of peace and safety.
Today, on December 6, a day that should be one of the worst in the annals of Indian history, the contemplation of this seems all the more pertinent.
But before I go far ahead of myself, let me go back in history to this quote from an eighteenth century historian, Vincent Smith, about India during the B.C years: “The Muslim Turks, like their forerunners, the Sakas and the Yueh-Chi, universally yielded to the wonderful assimilative power of Hinduism and rapidly became Hinduised.”
That leads me to wonder, what does Smith mean when he talks about Hinduism and Muslims becoming “Hinduised“? Clearly, he is not speaking in the narrow religious concept but in a broader sense. In fact, it is believed that the word “Hindu” was used by the Persians and Central Asians for “people living on this side of the Indus or the Sindhu river”. It is from the same that the name India originated. History tells us that the old inclusive term for religion in India was Arya Dharma till Buddhism and Jainism originated. So then, from where did the term Hinduism originate as a faith?
Interestingly, all who followed the Vedic dharma were subsequently referred to as the Hindus. The very beauty of Hinduism lies in its very amorphous, multi-faceted structure. It can hardly be defined in the classical sense of a faith or a religion. Hinduism, as a faith, has primarily been a national religion restricting itself to the land with no zealous missionary enterprises, no proselytization or looking outside the frontiers of India for “fresh recruits”. The very same Gandhiji, widely reviled as mentioned at the start of this page expressed all this very succinctly in a telling statement,
“Hinduism is more than just a faith or religion. It is a way of life”
Now, let me cross over the other side to Islam. CNN-IBN repeatedly telecasted excerpts from a Shah Rukh Khan interview this morning with a bold caption, “There is no Terror in Islam”. Not having read the Quran, I decline to comment on the veracity or accuracy of that statement. But I must add, from the Crusades to 9/11, from the invasion of Mahmud of Ghazni to the plundering acts of Nadir Shah, History definitely does not support that statement.
In the same vein, I recently happened to read an article in LA Times that threw up some interesting statistics comparing the state of Muslims in India to that of Dalits: “52% of Muslim men are unemployed, compared to 47% of Dalit men. Among Muslim women, 91% are unemployed, compared to 77% of Dalit women. Almost half the Muslims over the age of 46 cannot read or write. While making up 11% of the population, Muslims account for 40% of India’s prison population. Meanwhile, they hold less than 5% of government jobs”
It should be noted that these statistics apply specially to the Muslims in the lower strata of income levels. Another interesting statistic is that the population of Muslims in India, 150 million, is second only to Indonesia’s 190 million and higher than Pakistan’s 140 million and that of the many Arab countries as well. In other words, the 11% population of the Muslims is quite a sizeable figure in a land of over 1.4 billion. This, in fact, quite laughably, is another reason why people direct their spite at Gandhi for allowing Muslims to stay back in India!
At this juncture, I cannot help but quote from Nehru’s iconic Discovery of India: “India is infinitely absorbent like the ocean. It is odd to think that India, with her caste system and exclusiveness, has this astonishing inclusive capacity to absorb foreign races and cultures”
That is why, it felt more than just gratifying to see the middle-class educated Muslims protest against the 26/11 atrocity. That is also why Gandhiji, in his infinite wisdom and tolerance chose to allow the Muslims to stay back or leave on their will and not by force. So, then, was he wrong in doing what he did?
Alas, that shall remain a question that will be asked again and again for generations to come when Muslims commit many atrocities in India and many more inter-caste feuds happen. I may be a small voice, but I fervently hope that Hindus do not respond to this violence with violence of their own. That is an unfortunate trend being seen in the recent times with even a new term being coined, “Hindu Terror”.
It is one thing to fight fire with fire, but quite another when the two fires combine to set the entire country ablaze in a trail of national shame that is an embarassment to humanity itself!
But, after 26/11 and the statements from the terrorists and the statements that there were insiders in India who helped the terrorists, I have only one question to ask: “What are we poor unsuspecting Hindus supposed to think?”